Indonesian democrats have mixed feelings about Papua's independence drive
Stanley
To what extent has democratisation at the
centre benefited Papua? When Habibie took over from Suharto, Papuans
demanded that he give them what he gave East Timor, a choice for
autonomy or independence. The new government under president Gus Dur
tried to be more accommodating, for example by changing the name from
Irian Jaya to Papua and sending home a lot of troops. He even gave a
billion rupiah to Theys H Eluay to hold the Papuan People's Congress at
the end of May 2000.
But if Gus Dur hoped this would dampen
separatist demands he was wrong. The umbrella Papua Presidium Council
(PDP) set up a militant Papuan Task Force (Satuan Tugas Papua) in many
places. Its original purpose of preventing violence was soon buried
under its own brutality towards non-Papuan settlers. These
transmigrants are impoverished peasants from Java and Sulawesi and
themselves victims of the New Order. Task Force members also demand
money from business people and generally act thuggish. PDP leaders,
meanwhile, take advantage of Papuan anti-Indonesian emotions in order
to get themselves more gifts from the centre, for their personal use.
Unfortunately Papuans who interpreted Gus
Dur's sympathy as a readiness to give them an independence option were
also wrong. Papua was for Gus Dur just part of the political bargaining
to retain power. Under pressure from parliament over alleged
corruption, he said that if he was forced to resign, five Indonesian
regions would secede - among them Papua.
The separatist issue, in other words, is a
game for elites in Papua and in Jakarta. It has no significance for the
great mass of Papuans.
As 'ethno-nationalism' grew and the PDP
promised independence, economic envy led to clashes between indigenous
Papuans and non-Papuan settlers, for example in Wamena in late 2000.
Tensions also arose between highland and coastal people, with
highlanders accusing coastals of dominating the PDP. Where nationalism
should have been a force for democracy, PDP leaders turned it into an
anti-democratic one with overtones of racial hatred, also among Papuans
themselves.
The PDP leadership tried to accommodate
popular feeling by forming the Penis Gourd Brigade (Pasukan Koteka)
from Wamena to represent highlanders. Many of them flooded into
Jayapura just before 1 December 2000, creating fresh tensions there.
Non-Papuan settlers began to arm themselves - encouraged by the police
chief. Hoping to prevent more trouble, the security forces took
repressive action by arresting some PDP leaders on treason charges and
bringing in more troops - a total of 12,000 of them. All this
demonstrates a failure of democracy in Papua. Not to mention the many
roadblocks and attacks on strategic economic assets.
Amidst this confusion, the media have
thrown up many 'instant' leaders who might best be called democracy
consumers, while the important figures of a real democracy movement in
Papua are overlooked because they refuse to use primordial sentiments.
Examples of such genuine democrats are Bishop Herman Munninghoff who
fights military human rights abuse in the interior, Rev Herman Saud who
campaigns against violence and discrimination, Agustinus Rumansara who
works to strengthen civil society, Tom Beanal who pursues human rights
violators and supports indigenous empowerment, and John Gluba Gebze who
works to create clean government.
Nor do many Papuans get to hear much about
important human rights institutions like the Jayapura Legal Aid
Institute (LBH), the Papuan NGO Cooperative Forum (Foker LSM Papua) or
Elsham Papua. People are as if transfixed by the PDP's promise of
independence, even in the absence of a clear agenda to get there.
Suharto
The democratisers are overshadowed by the
likes of Theys Eluay, Thaha Al Hamid, Don Flassy and Herman Awom, who
in reality merely manipulate group sentiment for their personal ends.
Their backgrounds make interesting reading. Theys Eluay was part of the
Pepera council in 1969 that voted unanimously in favour of joining
Indonesia. He was a provincial parliamentarian for several terms under
Suharto. Thaha Al Hamid is a failed student and a failed administrator
in a range of non-government organisations (NGOs). For the 1999
elections he campaigned with Adi Sasono on behalf of the Partai Daulat
Rakyat, a party seriously stained by corruption allegations. Don
Flassy, meanwhile, is the secretary of the provincial planning agency
(Bappeda Irian Jaya) who failed to win the governorship.
Papuan nationalism has also turned several
OPM guerrillas into popular heroes. What most people don't know is that
they have now joined the National Liberation Army (Tentara Pembebasan
Nasional, TPN), which has a dubious relationship with the Indonesian
army.
So what do Indonesian democracy activists
think about Papua? Most are quite ignorant, but some Jakarta NGOs like
Elsam and Isai work with local NGOs to strengthen Papuan civil society.
There are differences among these Indonesian activists. Older ones want
Papuans to join them in a common struggle against injustice everywhere.
Younger ones are more open and ready to support anything they feel is
good for the Papuan people themselves, including a desire for
independence.
Stanley is a journalist and a manager at Isai, the Institute for the Free Flow of Information (isai@isai.or.id).
|