Contemporary art in Papua is about new and contested identities
Robyn Roper
At the first Freeport-sponsored Kamoro art
and cultural festival, in April 1998, a Kamoro drummer competing in the
dance category wore a plaited grass vest with the words 'Pakaian Adat'
or 'traditional costume' etched in charcoal on the back. Some audience
members, mostly Freeport employees, government officials and invited
journalists, laughed when they saw it. The drummer, meanwhile, showed
no response to their attention. The meaning of this statement might
seem ambiguous at best, but the power of ambiguity in art is its
ability to prompt questions from its audience. What did made the
audience laugh that evening?
Before European modern and surrealist
artists discovered tribal 'art' in the 1920s, few people had shown an
interest in the material culture of West New Guinea. Early missionaries
and Dutch colonial officials both removed ritual objects from Papuan
communities. The practice accelerated under an expanding missionary
influence after World War II, and even at first under Indonesian
governance. Woodcarvings embodied animist beliefs or allegiance to
tribal leaders. They were seen as obstacles to Christian conversion and
to colonial government alike. Objects were destroyed, or else collected
from villages and placed in museums, breaking ritual and artistic
traditions.
However, in the 1960s the Crosier
missionaries took a novel approach to traditional culture. They saw
woodcarving as integral to the identity of the Asmat people, and
encouraged Asmat communities to continue carving, hoping it would
provide artists and their communities with a source of income and
pride. They encouraged the view that art forms can be free of
traditional spiritual significance, and can thus be carried forth on
the journey into a 'modern' future.
This approach produced the Asmat Museum of
Culture and Progress, as well as an annual juried art auction intended
to foster a competitive spirit, community participation and innovation
in carving styles. The Crosiers' success convinced the Indonesian
government to allow Asmats to continue carving, and to end its
'modernising' practice of burning Asmat men's houses where carvings
were made. Indeed, it demonstrated that traditional art could enhance
the government's development plans by commercialising marketable art
forms.
Indonesian art
The Indonesian government now began to
actively promote an artistic revival in various Papuan communities. The
policy was not restricted to Papua. In the early 1970s the government
encouraged modern artists in Java to experiment with pan-Indonesian
styles by combining traditional motifs from across the archipelago, to
create a more distinctly 'Indonesian modern art' reflecting the
national motto 'Unity in Diversity'. Artistic traditions were distilled
into provincial 'identities', which were then consolidated as part of
state-sponsored nation building.
In the provincial capital Jayapura local
artists and landscape designers were commissioned to create public
sculptures and government buildings that incorporated traditional
architectural forms decorated with Papuan motifs. Stylised concrete
sculptures of Asmat 'bisj' poles and shields appeared, as did concrete
reliefs of the swirling motifs of Geelvink Bay and Lake Sentani, Yotefa
Bay canoe and spirit motifs, and the round traditional huts, spears,
stone axes and string bags of highlands people. Such a provincially
formulated art style is common across Indonesia. Perhaps the most
striking example of this appropriation is a large bronze Asmat warrior,
who aggressively guards the main gate of the Trikora military command
headquarters in the hills above Jayapura. The intention of this
appropriation of Papuan symbols and art forms is evidently to create a
redefined sense of place and cultural unity for the diverse ethnic
populations now congregating in these urban centres.
Pan-Papuan imagery is not restricted to
urban ornamentation. In 1983 a joint aid project established Batik
Irian, an income-generating project aimed at developing a Papuan batik
industry by introducing batik techniques from Java. Despite many
operational setbacks, Batik Irian has been remarkably well received.
The cloth is printed with a mix of ethnically distinct Papuan motifs,
usually in bright colours (initially due to a difficulty in sourcing
dye from Java). Batik Irian is worn with pride by Papuans and
non-Papuan migrants and used in uniforms for school children and civil
servants, ceremonial and special occasion attire and for tablecloths
and drapes in public spaces and hotels. The bold bright colours and
motifs have proven to be popular as an alternative to imported Javanese
batik.
Popular Batik Irian may be, but the
government's indifference towards cultural property rights sets a
precedent for the unsanctioned use of tribal symbols. Official art
developers convinced tribal leaders to abolish traditional carving
rights and restrictions on the use of motifs, arguing that such
concerns were no longer relevant. Among contemporary bark cloth
paintings produced by the Asei islanders of Lake Sentani, I noted
several unusual pieces clearly combining both Asmat and Sentani motifs.
The Asmat motifs were the 'bipane' (boar tusk nosepiece symbol) and
hornbill head (in brown), a crocodile (either Sentani or Asmat), Asmat
human figures that transform into Sentani spiral motifs called 'fouw'
and Sentani fish. Such a fusion is reminiscent of Batik Irian, yet the
use of Asmat motifs by Sentani people for monetary gain goes against
unspoken rules of conduct among many Papuan artists.
In the past, across much of Papua, use of
another tribe's motifs without adequately negotiated compensation was
grounds for retaliation. Traditional motifs were guarded and sometimes
confined to members of carving lineages who were sworn to secrecy. But
these new paintings were based on a stencil process quicker than hand
painting. Two prominent Asei painters designed the stencil
experimentally, as a teaching aid in a painting workshop. The resulting
paintings based on the stencil were popular and sold well to tourists.
It was a surprising development, since Asei artists are themselves
frustrated that Sentani motifs have been appropriated by migrant South
Sulawesian traders. The migrants monopolise the handicrafts trade at
Papua's largest art market in Hamadi, outside Jayapura. The lack of
controls on the use of tribal motifs is something many Papuan artists
and cultural leaders are determined to remedy in the future in order to
maintain the integrity of artistic traditions.
Take control
Other artists have reacted decisively
against the homogenisation of cultural forms. Nico Haluk is a Dani man
from Siepkosi village, near Wamena. Historically, highlands people did
little figural carving, though bows and arrows carved with small
geometric motifs were common. Nico initiated his own carving style in
reaction to the sale of coastal Asmat art and of the penis gourd as the
main highlands souvenir in Wamena's shops. Proud of his traditional
Dani culture, Nico carves Dani figures wearing traditional dress
including grass skirts and penis gourds, not simply as a novelty or
curiosity, but contextualised into scenes of Dani myths and customs,
everyday life and landscapes. In creating this new style Nico also
addressed another problem Dani face, namely that they get plenty of
tourist attention but few tourist dollars. Nico's innovative carving
style has become popular. Several carvers are now involved in a Unesco
project to promote Dani arts through an art cooperative.
Art provides Papuans with an income to pay
for their children's education, medicines or household items. But the
opportunities are limited. I visited Asmat villages where many artists,
unable to make a living from their carving alone, were away for weeks
at a time logging their land for foreign companies.
At the core of the relentless Papuan
demands for greater political, economic and cultural self-determination
in recent years is, ironically, a pan-Papuan identity that has been
influenced by Indonesian government policy itself. With competing
stakes in the control of cultural production, many Papuan artists are
concerned to take control of their individual and collective identity
and prevent its unauthorised use and manipulation by outsiders.
So why did that Freeport audience laugh at
the Kamoro drummer with the words 'traditional costume' on his back?
The deeper context in which he made his statement reveals more of its
possible meaning. Freeport organisers had asked Kamoro participants to
keep their outfits 'traditional'. In return, Kamoro villagers received
a per diem payment and compensation for travel expenses for
participating in Freeport's self-proclaimed 'revival of Kamoro arts'.
Did the vest represent what the drummer thought would please Freeport
staff in order to receive his payment? Or was he commenting in a subtle
yet subversive way on Freeport's attempt to control his
self-expression? Just possibly, he was making his audience laugh at
themselves.
Robyn Roper (robyn.roper@home.com) recently wrote a master's thesis on contemporary art production in Papua at the University of Victoria, Canada.
|