The October 12 bombing in Bali, like most
incidents of violence, was very brief, a matter of only seconds, yet
its effects will be with us for a long time. The effects extend beyond
the tragic loss of loved ones and the painful scars of the survivors.
The bombing has badly damaged the cross-cultural, cross-national
communication that this magazine has been trying to promote for the
last twenty years. Many Australians (and other foreigners) studying,
working, or vacationing in Indonesia have returned home. Indonesians
living in Australia have been harassed.
Meanwhile, the Indonesian and Australian
governments are eroding civil liberties in the name of fighting
terrorism. Activists in both countries struggling non-violently for
peace and justice are worried that they too will become targets of the
anti-terrorism campaign. Added to these worries is the prospect of
increased instability in Indonesia as the already faltering economy
declines further.
As the repercussions of the bombing keep
spreading, we should remember that it was the work of a small clique of
conspirators. Although the perpetrators targeted foreigners, they were
obviously indifferent to the lives of Indonesians and to the welfare of
the nation. The bombing should not affect our appreciation of the need
to maintain strong society-society relations between Indonesia and
Australia.
Indonesia today is a dangerous place primarily for
Indonesians, not foreigners. Hundreds of thousands of people have been
displaced by war. Some 600 Acehnese civilians have been killed in 2002.
The task of making Indonesia a safer place is much larger than bringing
to justice the clandestine group responsible for the Bali bombing.
Foreigners need to continue to help Indonesian civil society find ways
to end the violence and to ensure their own governments do not follow
policies that encourage it.
The deadline for submission of articles to this
issue was only three days after the Bali bombing. We decided to proceed
with this present issue about the military and militarism. Our next
issue (no. 74) will be devoted to reflections on the bombing and its
consequences.
The bombing has actually confirmed the importance
of the theme of this issue. Given the military�s notorious corruption,
it has been widely assumed that the bombers obtained their explosives
from the military. This is a reasonable assumption: the first suspect
arrested by the police (Amrozi) was found to have some 4,000
military-issue bullets. Given that elements in the military have been
supporting extremist militias (such as Laskar Jihad), it has also been
assumed that the bombers have had some backing from within the
military.
The articles in this
issue reveal that the Indonesian military, assigning as many troops to
internal policing as external defence, has become a security threat for
the society. Since about 70% of the military�s funding comes from
off-budget sources, the loyalty of the troops is divided between the
state and the private businesses (sometimes illegal businesses) that
pay their salaries. The military is in desperate need of reform. But
the task of reforming it has become immeasurably more difficult as
civil society itself has become militarized. This issue carries several
excellent articles on the civilian militias that have emerged in recent
years.
We at Inside Indonesia
are proud of the high quality of articles we have been able to publish.
Our magazine was a finalist in the United Nations Association of
Australia media awards for an article titled �Timor's Women� by Dawn
Delaney in the East Timor edition (no.71). Congratulations to Dawn.
Because of a recent
budgetary crisis, we have had to temporarily suspend publication of the
supplement �Learning about Indonesia.� We regret the demise and hope to
hear from friends with ideas on how to restart it.
John Roosa
jproosa@indo.net.id
Inside Indonesia 73: Jan-Mar 2003
|