Women are now on both sides of the camera
Krishna Sen
In 2004, for the first time, a woman took away the best director’s
award at the annual Indonesian film festival. The winner, Nia Dinata,
is one of Indonesia’s new generation of women film producers and
directors. Her film, Arisan, was produced by Kalyana Shira, a production company set up expressly to support the work of women directors.
Only three women had worked as directors between the production of the
first film in Indonesia in 1926 and the end of the New Order in 1998,
producing between them only half-a-dozen or so films. These won neither
critical nor popular acclaim. On screen, women were most commonly seen
in domestic settings, dependent on and defined by the male protagonist.
By contrast, Arisan is one of a number of successful films
since 2000 that have been produced and/or directed by women, and tell
women’s stories. But does this represent a gender revolution in
Indonesian cinema?
Women behind the camera
Some of the most prominent directors of the New Order (by definition,
men) were no longer making films by the end of the 1990s. At the same
time, the rise of serialised television family drama (known in
Indonesia as sinetron) had brought increasing numbers of women into the
edges of cinema. When a new generation of film-makers emerged after
1998, there were as many women as male directors, writers and
producers. Particularly important among them were Mira Lesmana
(independent producer and director), Nan T Achnas (writer and director
of Pasir Berbisik) and Nia Dinata (director of Ca-bau-kan and more recently Arisan).
These women, and many of the women on their production teams, have much
in common with each other and much that separates them from the older
generation of male film directors. All are young, articulate, fluent in
English, and trained in western universities. They all cut their
artistic teeth in television and advertising. Lesmana and Achnas were
part of the self-aware film movement that launched itself via the
collectively produced experimental film Kuldesak in 1998. Dinata burst onto the wide screen with the sumptuously produced Ca-bau-kan (The Courtesan) in 2000.
Ideologically and artistically, these women never experienced the
restrictions of the New Order. However they were all born into
well-connected families and in different ways grew up within mainstream
New Order culture. Nan Achnas and Nia Dinata have both made films that
explicitly set out to challenge the New Order’s gender regime. But
their films don’t escape its influence.
Abject women on screen
Nan Achnas’ Pasir Berbisik (Whispering Sands, 2001),
promoted as an art film, depicts death and destruction in an arid
countryside. For a post-New Order audience, the violence the film
portrays is readily equated with the meaningless and erratic brutality
of that regime. Yet, as in many commercial feature films of the New
Order, the film’s female leads are portrayed as the powerless victims
of that brutality.
Nia Dinata’s Ca-bau-kan also breaks many New Order cinema
boundaries. Even its Chinese title, a language banned from all media
after the coup in 1965, would not have passed New Order censorship. The
male hero of the film, Tan Peng Liang, challenges most of the moral and
ethnicìstereotypes of New Order media culture. However, the female
lead, Tinung, is a re-enactment of perhaps the most common female
archetype of Indonesian cinema: a young woman whose survival depends on
her status as a wife or courtesan (ca-bau-kan in the film’s title).
There is hardly a single scene where she is not entertaining, serving
or mourning for a man, or being raped or abused by them.
Beyond commercial cinema
As these films show, the arrival of women into the film industry may
not by itself necessarily revolutionise gender codes. However,
technological change is now opening up more opportunities than ever
before.
Digital recording technologies are now being used to produce an amazing
array of films in Indonesia. Short films, documentaries and
experimental film, produced on campuses and in NGOs by women and men are re-defining ways of both making films and looking at women.
In these films, shown to tiny audiences in kine-clubs, cafes and
college common rooms, we find everything from the bizarre to the
poetic, and the most gut-wrenchingly realistic documentaries on women
political prisoners. It is here, perhaps, that we discover the
potential cinema holds for women’s emancipation on screen and off, in
an age where the moving image is no longer the preserve of the
commercial media.
Krishna Sen (K.sen@curtin.edu.au) is Professor of Asian Media and Dean of Research in the Division of Humanities, Curtin University of Technology.
Inside Indonesia 83: Jul-Sep 2005
|